000003082 001__ 3082
000003082 005__ 20190228205114.0
000003082 022__ $$a03092402
000003082 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1111/jan.13475
000003082 037__ $$aARTICLE
000003082 041__ $$aeng
000003082 245__ $$aMeta-analysis of the effectiveness of nursing discharge planning interventions for older inpatients discharged home
000003082 260__ $$c2018-01
000003082 269__ $$a2018-01
000003082 300__ $$a12 p.
000003082 506__ $$avisible
000003082 520__ $$9eng$$aAim: To determine the effectiveness of nursing discharge planning interventions on health-related outcomes for older inpatients discharged home.
Background: Inadequate discharge planning for the ageing population poses significant
challenges for health services. Effective discharge planning interventions have been
examined in several studies, but little information is available on nursing interventions for older people. Despite the research published on the importance of discharge planning, the impact on patient’s health outcomes still needs to be evaluated in practice.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources: A systematic search was undertaken across 13 databases to retrieve
published and unpublished studies in English between 2000–2015.
Review Methods: Critical appraisal, data extraction and meta-analysis followed the
methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Results: Thirteen studies were included in the review, 2 of 13 were pilot studies and one had a pre-post design. Included studies involved 3,964 participants with a median age of 77 years. Nurse discharge planning did not significantly reduce hospital readmission or quality of life, except readmission was lower across studies conducted in the USA. The overall effect score for nurse discharge planning on length of stay was statistically significant and positive.
Conclusion: Nursing discharge planning is a complex intervention and difficult to evaluate. Findings suggest that nursing discharge planning for older inpatients discharged home increases the length of stay yet neither reduces readmission rate nor improves quality of life.
000003082 540__ $$aincorrect
000003082 592__ $$aLa Source
000003082 592__ $$bSecteur Recherche et Développement (Ra&D) de l'Institut et Haute Ecole de la Santé La Source
000003082 592__ $$cSanté
000003082 65017 $$aSanté
000003082 655__ $$ascientifique
000003082 6531_ $$9eng$$aaged
000003082 6531_ $$9eng$$adischarge planning
000003082 6531_ $$9eng$$ahospitalization
000003082 6531_ $$9eng$$ameta-analysis
000003082 6531_ $$9eng$$anurs
000003082 700__ $$aMabire, Cédric Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University ; Lausanne University Hospital ; 2Bureau d’Echange des Savoirs pour des praTique exemplaires de soins: an Affiliate Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute,$$uInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University and Lausanne University Hospital ; Bureau d’Echange des Savoirs pour des praTique exemplaires de soins: an Affiliate Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Lausanne ; Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)
000003082 700__ $$aDwyer, Andrew$$u1Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University and Lausanne University Hospital ; Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) ; Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill
000003082 700__ $$aGarnier, Antoine$$uLausanne University Hospital (CHUV)
000003082 700__ $$aPellet, Joanie$$uInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Lausanne University and Lausanne University Hospital ; Bureau d’Echange des Savoirs pour des praTique exemplaires de soins: an Affiliate Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Lausanne
000003082 773__ $$g2018, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 788-799$$tJournal of Advanced Nursing
000003082 8564_ $$uhttps://hesso.tind.io/record/3082/files/MabireEtal_2018_JAdvancedNursing.pdf$$s676757
000003082 906__ $$aNONE
000003082 909CO $$pGLOBAL_SET$$ooai:hesso.tind.io:3082
000003082 950__ $$aSan2
000003082 981__ $$ascientifique
000003082 980__ $$ascientifique